Posted 9/18/2023, 9:49:45 PM

DOJ Objects to Redactions in Google Antitrust Trial, Worries Public Understanding Is Hindered

The DOJ objected when the court removed the public from parts of the Google trial to protect trade secrets.
The DOJ worries that too much redaction of information could weaken the public's understanding of their case against Google.
More testimony is likely to be sealed as the trial continues.
Google argues redactions are necessary, but the DOJ says it hinders the public's ability to evaluate the case.
The judge has sided with Google on privacy concerns, rejecting public audio streams of the trial.

arstechnica.com

Relevant topic timeline:

8/31/2023

Google targets DOJ antitrust chief with bias allegations in monopoly defense

Google has questioned the motivations of the US Justice Department's top antitrust official in a filing to a district court, arguing that his past clients create an ethical conflict and raise doubts about the government's lawsuit against the tech giant.

9/6/2023

US lawmakers are pushing Google to restructure amid monopoly concerns

The US Justice Department has started a 10-week trial against Google, accusing the company of monopolistic practices in dominating the search engine market through its business partnerships, including with Apple, to ensure its search engine is the default on mobile devices.

9/11/2023

DOJ Sues Google for Monopoly, Allege Search Dominance Stems from Anticompetitive Practices Rather Than Product Superiority

The trial against Google, initiated by the Department of Justice (DOJ), will test the Biden administration's efforts to rein in the power of tech giants and curb Google's dominance in online search, which could have broad implications for other investigations into companies like Amazon and Apple.

9/11/2023

Google Faces Landmark Antitrust Trial Over Search Dominance

The biggest tech monopoly trial in decades, where the US Department of Justice and state attorneys general will argue that Google violated anti-monopoly law through exclusive agreements, begins on Tuesday.

9/11/2023

Google Faces Antitrust Trial Over Search Deals With Apple As Rivals Hope To Break Search Monopoly

Google is facing a historic legal battle against the U.S. government in a generational antitrust case that questions the company's dominance in internet search and its contracts with device makers, including a lucrative deal with Apple.

9/13/2023

Apple Objects to Google Antitrust Trial Data Disclosure on Day Two

The landmark anti-monopoly trial against Google continues with tensions over confidentiality restrictions and accusations of rule violations.

9/13/2023

Google Used Deals to Maintain Search Dominance, U.S. Says on First Day of Antitrust Trial

The Justice Department's antitrust trial against Google began with claims that the company pursued agreements to be the default search engine on mobile devices, while Google argued that its search engine's quality was the primary reason for such agreements.

9/15/2023

Verizon Exec to Testify in Google Antitrust Trial About Carrier Deals

Verizon executive Brian Higgins will be the first witness in the Justice Department's antitrust trial against Google, facing questions about the search giant's agreements with wireless carriers to be the default on their smartphones.

9/18/2023

U.S. Questions Verizon, Google on Default Browser and Search Deals

The US Justice Department questions Verizon executive about pre-installing Google software on mobile phones, as part of antitrust case against Google.

9/18/2023

U.S. Seeks Public Access in Google Antitrust Trial over Online Ad Pricing

The U.S. Justice Department objects to excluding the public from court discussions on Google's pricing for online advertising, arguing that it is essential information in the antitrust case against the tech giant.

9/21/2023

Judge Orders DOJ to Remove Google Trial Exhibits After Company Objects to 'Embarrassing' Document

The Department of Justice was ordered to remove exhibits from its website in the antitrust trial against Google after Google complained that the DOJ was sharing trial exhibits online. Judge Amit Mehta stated that the exhibits are public documents once admitted into evidence, but a final ruling on public access is yet to be made.